Dyslexia Help & Reading Therapy FAQ for Parents
How do I choose the best dyslexia program for my child?
Choose a program that matches your child’s exact missing skills and provides enough weekly practice to build automatic reading.
A strong program does these things, in order:
Speech and sound foundations
phonemic awareness, including segmenting and blending
strong recall of sounds without strain
systematic sound to letter mapping
Written code and advanced code
clear teaching of the alphabetic code
advanced code taught by mapping sounds to print, not by memorizing rules
Orthographic mapping
daily work that links sounds, letters, and meaning
reading and spelling taught as one system so words become stored for instant retrieval
Fluency and automaticity
practice that moves reading from accurate to fast and effortless
connected reading early enough to build real-world skill
You should see measurable change within a few weeks to a month. If the program cannot name your child’s missing skill and show progress quickly, it is not the right match.
How are Orton Gillingham programs different from speech to print programs?
Most Orton Gillingham based programs rely heavily on:
phonics rules and rule charts
memorizing sight words alongside phonics
syllable types and syllable routines
multisensory steps such as arm tapping or tracing
high mastery requirements before moving on
Because of that structure, grade level proficiency often moves slowly. Many families are told to expect one to three years of tutoring, and some require longer.
Speech to print programs focus on the written code and the sounds in spoken words, not rule memorization, syllable labels, or tapping routines. The goal is to rebuild the sound to print pathway directly, which usually produces faster decoding gains and stronger fluency earlier.
Large research reviews do not show stronger outcomes for Orton Gillingham over other explicit, systematic approaches, especially when OG is delivered at low intensity or without individualized targets.
What is a typical session frequency for dyslexia tutoring?
Most dyslexia tutoring in the market is one to two sessions per week for 45 to 60 minutes.
That can support mild readers, but far behind dyslexic readers usually need more intensity across the week plus daily home practice. Without that, progress often stalls even with a good tutor.
What does dyslexia tutoring usually cost?
Typical ranges in the U.S.:
General tutoring
about $25 to $80 per hour
Specialized dyslexia or science of reading tutoring
commonly $60 to $100 per hour or more
private packages can exceed $125 per hour depending on assessment, materials, and parent coaching
Price alone does not tell you if it will work. The match to root cause and intensity are what drive results.
How do I know if a dyslexia tutor is effective?
A strong tutor can tell you these things clearly:
what skill is missing
how they will rebuild it
how they will measure progress
what changes they make if your child stalls
what you will do at home between sessions
You should see early measurable improvement within weeks, then continued growth month by month. If accuracy improves but speed does not move for months, that is a stall signal.
What progress milestones should I expect?
First few weeks
less guessing
stronger blending and segmenting
improved decoding accuracy on taught patterns
By one month
faster recall of taught patterns
spelling starts matching instruction
reading rate begins to lift
By about 12 weeks
patterns become automatic
multisyllable words stabilize
fluency improves on real text
comprehension improves because decoding takes less effort
When the target is right and intensity is high enough, progress should not take years.
Are there free or low cost dyslexia resources?
Yes. Families can explore:
university reading clinics
public library tutoring partnerships
nonprofit dyslexia centers
structured literacy or linguistic phonics parent supports
decodable text libraries paired with guided routines
Low cost resources help most when they still target the correct missing skill and include consistent home practice.
Should I choose 1 to 1 online tutoring or in person tutoring?
Online tutoring works well when:
instruction is explicit and interactive
the tutor gives real time correction
lessons are structured and visual
your child can stay engaged on screen
daily home practice is supported
In person tutoring may be better when:
attention is fragile and needs physical presence
sensory regulation needs are high
handwriting or motor support is central
Location matters less than correct targets and enough weekly practice.
What qualifications should I look for in a reading tutor?
Titles do not guarantee results. The method matters more.
Look for a tutor who is trained in:
phonemic awareness and advanced sound work
sound to letter mapping
advanced code instruction
orthographic mapping
multisyllable decoding
fluency building and automaticity
Ask directly:
What skill is missing right now
How will you measure progress in the first month
What changes do you make if progress stalls
What daily home plan will you give me
Parent involvement and a clear daily practice plan matter more than a name on a certificate.
What does research say about Orton Gillingham versus structured literacy?
Structured literacy is the research aligned umbrella that includes explicit, systematic teaching of phonology, sound to symbol mapping, spelling, multisyllable reading, fluency, and meaning.
Orton Gillingham is one tradition inside that umbrella. Research supports the structured literacy principles, but large reviews have not shown Orton Gillingham interventions to be reliably stronger than comparison approaches, especially for fluency and spelling outcomes. Intensity and correct targeting are major drivers of success.
How do I choose between tutoring programs?
Use this quick checklist.
Choose the program that can show you:
a root cause target, not a generic label
a clear plan for daily practice
a way to measure change within weeks
a path from accuracy to fluency
parent guidance so intensity is high enough
If a program cannot do those things, it is unlikely to produce fast, lasting results.